[Click here for a PDF version of this post]

This is part II of a series, continuing from our expansion of \( F^2 \) previously.

We are going to use the coordinate expansion of the Lagrangian, so we need the tensor form of Maxwell’s equation for comparison.

Maxwell’s equations, with electric and fictional magnetic sources (useful for antenna theory and other engineering applications), are

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:220}

\begin{aligned}

\spacegrad \cdot \BE &= \frac{\rho}{\epsilon} \\

\spacegrad \cross \BE &= – \BM – \mu \PD{t}{\BH} \\

\spacegrad \cdot \BH &= \frac{\rho_\txtm}{\mu} \\

\spacegrad \cross \BH &= \BJ + \epsilon \PD{t}{\BE}.

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

We can assemble these into a single geometric algebra equation,

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:240}

\lr{ \spacegrad + \inv{c} \PD{t}{} } F = \eta \lr{ c \rho – \BJ } + I \lr{ c \rho_m – \BM },

\end{equation}

where \( F = \BE + \eta I \BH = \BE + I c \BB \).

We can put this into STA form by multiplying through by \( \gamma_0 \), making the identification \( \Be_k = \gamma_k \gamma_0 \). For the space time derivatives, we have

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:260}

\begin{aligned}

\gamma_0 \lr{ \spacegrad + \inv{c} \PD{t}{} }

&=

\gamma_0 \lr{ \gamma_k \gamma_0 \PD{x_k}{} + \PD{x_0}{} } \\

&=

-\gamma_k \partial_k + \gamma_0 \partial_0 \\

&=

\gamma^k \partial_k + \gamma^0 \partial_0 \\

&=

\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \\

&\equiv \grad

.

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

For our 0,2 multivectors on the right hand side, we find, for example

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:280}

\begin{aligned}

\gamma_0 \eta \lr{ c \rho – \BJ }

&=

\gamma_0 \eta c \rho – \gamma_0 \gamma_k \gamma_0 \eta (\BJ \cdot \Be_k) \\

&=

\gamma_0 \eta c \rho + \gamma_k \eta (\BJ \cdot \Be_k) \\

&=

\gamma_0 \frac{\rho}{\epsilon} + \gamma_k \eta (\BJ \cdot \Be_k).

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

So, if we make the identifications

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:300}

\begin{aligned}

J^0 &= \frac{\rho}{\epsilon} \\

J^k &= \eta \lr{ \BJ \cdot \Be_k } \\

M^0 &= c \rho_m \\

M^k &= \BM \cdot \Be_k,

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

and \( J = J^\mu \gamma_\mu, M = M^\mu \gamma_\mu \), and \( \grad = \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \) we find the STA form of Maxwell’s equation, including magnetic sources

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:320}

\grad F = J – I M.

\end{equation}

The electromagnetic field, in it’s STA representation is a bivector, which we can write without reference to observer specific electric and magnetic fields, as

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:340}

F = \inv{2} {\gamma_\mu \wedge \gamma_\nu} F^{\mu\nu},

\end{equation}

where \( F^{\mu\nu} \) is an arbitrary antisymmetric 2nd rank tensor. Maxwell’s equation has a vector and trivector component, which may be split out explicitly using grade selection, to find

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:360}

\begin{aligned}

\grad \cdot F &= J \\

\grad \wedge F &= -I M.

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

Dotting the vector equation with \( \gamma^\mu \), we have

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:380}

\begin{aligned}

J^\mu

&=

\inv{2} \gamma^\mu \cdot \lr{ \gamma^\alpha \cdot \lr{ \gamma_{\sigma} \wedge \gamma_{\pi} } \partial_\alpha F^{\sigma \pi} } \\

&=

\inv{2} \lr{

{\delta^\mu}_\pi {\delta^\alpha}_\sigma

–

{\delta^\mu}_\sigma {\delta^\alpha}_\pi

}

\partial_\alpha F^{\sigma \pi} \\

&=

\inv{2}

\lr{

\partial_\sigma F^{\sigma \mu}

–

\partial_\pi F^{\mu \pi}

}

\\

&=

\partial_\sigma F^{\sigma \mu}.

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

We can find the tensor form of the trivector equation by wedging it with \( \gamma^\mu \). On the left we have

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:400}

\begin{aligned}

\gamma^\mu \wedge \lr{ \grad \wedge F }

&=

\inv{2} \gamma^\mu \wedge \gamma^\nu \wedge \gamma^\alpha \wedge \gamma^\beta \partial_\nu F_{\alpha\beta} \\

&=

\inv{2} I \epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} \partial_\nu F_{\alpha\beta}.

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

On the right, we have

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:420}

\begin{aligned}

\gamma^\mu \wedge \lr{ -I M }

&=

-\gpgrade{ \gamma^\mu I M }{4} \\

&=

\gpgrade{ I \gamma^\mu M }{4} \\

&=

I \lr{ \gamma^\mu \cdot M } \\

&=

I M^\mu,

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

so we have

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:440}

\begin{aligned}

\partial_\nu \lr{

\inv{2}

\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}

F_{\alpha\beta}

}

=

M^\mu.

\end{aligned}

\end{equation}

Note that, should we want to, we can define a dual tensor \( G^{\mu\nu} = -(1/2) \epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} F_{\alpha\beta} \), so that the electric and magnetic components of Maxwell’s equation have the same structure

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:460}

\partial_\nu F^{\nu\mu} = J^{\mu}, \quad \partial_\nu G^{\nu\mu} = M^{\mu}.

\end{equation}

Now that we have the tensor form of Maxwell’s equation, we can proceed to try to find the Lagrangian. We will assume that the Lagrangian density for Maxwell’s equation has the multivector structure

\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fsquared:n}

\LL = \gpgrade{F^2}{0,4} + a \lr{ A \cdot J } + b I \lr{ A \cdot M},

\end{equation}

where \( F = \grad \wedge A \). My hunch, since the multivector current has the form \( J – I M \), is that we don’t actually need the grade two component of \( F^2 \), despite having spent the time computing it, thinking that it might be required.

Next time, we’ll remind ourselves what the field Euler-Lagrange equations look like, and evaluate them to see if we can find the constants \(a, b\).

Peeter Joot's Blog » A coordinate free variation of the Maxwell equation multivector Lagrangian.10 months agoPeeter Joot's Blog » Progressing towards coordinate free form of the Euler-Lagrange equations for Maxwell’s equation10 months agoPeeter Joot's Blog » Multivector Lagrangian for Maxwell’s equation.10 months ago