New video: Velocity and angular momentum with geometric algebra

September 7, 2023 math and physics play , , , , ,

 

In this video, we compute velocity in a radial representation \( \mathbf{x} = r \mathbf{\hat{r}} \).

We use a scalar radial coordinate \( r \), and leave all the angular dependence implicitly encoded in a radial unit vector \( \mathbf{\hat{r}} \).

We find the geometric algebra structure of the \( \mathbf{\hat{r}}’ \) in two different ways, to find

\( \mathbf{\hat{r}}’ = \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r} \left( \mathbf{\hat{r}} \wedge \mathbf{\hat{x}}’ \right), \)

then derive the conventional triple vector cross product equivalent for reference:

\( \mathbf{\hat{r}}’ = \left( \mathbf{\hat{r}} \times \mathbf{\hat{x}}’ \right) \times \frac{\mathbf{\hat{r}}}{r}. \)

We then compute kinetic energy in this representation, and show how a bivector-valued angular momentum \( L = \mathbf{x} \wedge \mathbf{p} \), falls naturally from that computation, where we have

\( \frac{m}{2} \mathbf{v}^2 = \frac{1}{2 m} {(m r’)}^2 – \frac{1}{2 m r^2 } L^2. \)

Prerequisites: calculus (derivatives and chain rule), and geometric algebra basics (vector multiplication, commutation relationships for vectors and bivectors in a plane, wedge and cross product equivalencies, …)

Errata: at around 4:12 I used \( \mathbf{r} \) instead of \( \mathbf{x} \), then kept doing so every time after that when the value for \( L \) was stated.

As well as being posted to Google’s censorship-tube, this video can also be found on odysee.

Updated figures in ‘Geometric Algebra for Electrical Engineers’

September 2, 2023 Geometric Algebra for Electrical Engineers , , ,

New version of the book is now published (online PDF and leanpub versions updated, with amazon updates in the approval pipeline)

  • V0.1.19-2 (Sep 2, 2023)
    • Reworked many of the Mathematica generated figures.  Now using the MaTeX[] extension to do the figure labelling (that was only done in a couple figures before this), as it looks much better, and is consistent with the fonts in the text.

      Each of these are individually very small changes, barely noticeable, but I think it makes a nice difference to overall quality.

      In many cases, I’ve generated new separate figures for the amazon paper editions of the book, using straight black instead of colors, so they don’t look as washed out, after conversion to black and white.

Here’s an example where just the captioning was changed:

The font is now whatever LaTeX uses for \\mathbf{n}, so it matches the text.

I think that the new Mathematica version (13.2) that I am using, also happens to render this 3D figure a bit nicer.

Here’s a comparison of one of the figures that now has a black and white specialization (old, new-color, new-bw):

In this particular case, I chose not to color the labels like I did previously, but I have retained that label color matching in some places.

Like I said, it’s a small difference, but the latex labelling just look better, period.  Notice that the numeric values at the tick marks on the border of the figure are not using a matching font (those are directly generated by Mathematica).  I’ll have to figure out how to make those use MaTeX too, and audit all the figures for that, but that’s a game for another day.

Vanity press: Exploring physics with geometric algebra

August 27, 2023 math and physics play

I just printed a copy of my ancient notes compilations for geometric algebra and physics, a compilation of old blog posts, using kindle direct publishing.

Amazon author copies don’t seem to be available in Canada anymore, so I had to buy a regular copy (printed in Bolton, Ontario, Canada!), but did so my setting the price as low as possible on amazon.ca (about $20 CAD each).  That means that I got bound and printed books, with 469+503 pages, in 8.5×11″ format for about $40 (buying an author copy from the US amazon.com would have cost more after shipping and currency conversion.)  I don’t think that I could have gotten bound print copies that cheap at one of the St George copy houses that service the university.

Now that I have my copies, I’ll un-publish these from amazon, so that nobody buys them by mistake.  I just wanted a copy of each as a reference for myself (as I do refer to parts of them sometimes — like the Pauli matrix/GA-equivalents writeup.)

This leaves me with 9 active titles on amazon (one is my book, and the rest are all course notes.)

Video: Spherical basis vectors in geometric algebra

August 8, 2023 Geometric Algebra for Electrical Engineers , ,

I’ve made a new manim-based video with a geometric algebra application.

In the video, the geometric algebra form for the spherical unit vectors are derived, then unpacked to find the conventional vector algebra form. We will then use our new tools to find the expression for the kinetic energy of a particle in spherical coordinates.

Prerequisites: calculus (derivatives and chain rule), complex numbers (exponential polar form), and geometric algebra basics (single sided rotations, vector multiplication, vector commutation sign changes, …)

You can find the video on Google’s censorship-tube, or on odysee.

Geometric algebra: a very short video introduction.

August 1, 2023 math and physics play , ,


Here’s another geometric algebra video, weighing in at a massive 2:29 (minutes.)

This video is a very short introduction to geometric algebra, showing the most basic concepts and how to apply them to the 2D geometric algebra of the Euclidean plane. Those concepts aren’t developed further in this video, but the idea is just to show the most basic consequences of the definitions.

Prerequisites: basic vector algebra (basis, vector space, dot product space, arrow representation of vectors, graphical vector addition, …)

If you watched yesterday’s video, don’t both watching this one, since it is extracted from that with no additions.

You can find the video on Google’s censorship-tube, and on odysee.