Our company is scattered to the wind around the world, and I’m often left wondering “what time is it there, right now?”
( I often work with people in Brussels, Paris, and the UK too, but that’s all in the Zurich timezone. )
Our company is scattered to the wind around the world, and I’m often left wondering “what time is it there, right now?”
( I often work with people in Brussels, Paris, and the UK too, but that’s all in the Zurich timezone. )
Is this any more believable auf Deutsch?
Es tut mir leid, Sie in dieser Angelegenheit ohne Ihre vorherige Zustimmung zu kontaktieren. Es war wegen der Dringlichkeit der Angelegenheit.
Ich bin Desmond OGEGEREGE, ein Rechtsanwalt, und der persönliche Anwalt von ein verstorbener Kunde aus Ihrem Land. Ich würde gerne wissen, ob wir zusammenarbeiten können in diese Transaktion?
Seit dem Tod meines Mandanten, sein Fonds im Wert Millionen in Dollar, in der Bank meines Landes ruhend gewesen. Die Bank hat mir eine Mitteilung gemacht, um die nächsten Angehörigen für die Forderung der Fonds zu präsentieren, andernfalls werden die Gelder beschlagnahmt.
Der Verstorbene starb bei einem Autounfall mit seiner ganzen Familie. Ich schreibe Ihnen in dieser Angelegenheit, weil Sie den gleichen Familiennamen wie der Verstorbene haben, daher können Sie an die Bank als mein verstorbener Kunde nächsten Angehörigen vorgestellt werden. Mit meiner Unterstützung als der verstorbene persönliche Anwalt, können Sie von der Bank genehmigt werden und das Geld wird Ihnen freigegeben werden.
Ich freue mich auf Ihre Antwort, wenn Sie interessiert sind und ich werde Ihnen weitere Details senden.
Google translate says this is:
I am sorry to contact you in this matter without your prior consent. It was because of the urgency of the matter.
I am Desmond OGEGEREGE, a lawyer, and the personal advocate of a deceased customer from your country. I would like to know if we can work together in this transaction?
Since the death of my client, his fund worth millions in dollars, has been resting in the bank of my country. The bank has sent me a message to present the next of kin for claiming the funds, otherwise the funds will be confiscated.
The deceased died in a car accident with his entire family. I am writing to you on this matter because you have the same surname as the deceased, therefore you can be introduced to the bank as my deceased customer next of kin. With my support as the late personal attorney, you can be approved by the bank and the money will be released to you.
I look forward to your answer, if you are interested and I will send you further details.
The little bit of German that I learned to read Euler’s books at the math library 25 years ago, aren’t enough for me to reply, but let’s see if they also speak english.
This is one upgrade I really wished I hadn’t done. The system has been pestering me for a month to do it, and I made the mistake of letting the upgrade go ahead a few days ago.
I suspect that I’ll be finding out what else is broken as I continue to use the new OS.
November 11th, known as “Remembrance Day” in Canada, is pretty much intolerable on social media. We are inundated with flags and blind patriotism, pictures of veterans posing in the formations of their original invasion pictures, inane comments like “he died so I could live”, “the price for freedom” and other similar obfuscated war propaganda.
This is the day for the inhuman celebration of the killing of the unnamed enemy, forgetting that that enemy had a face. This is a day for forgetting that the enemy was also coerced into fighting in the name of their worthless governments or country, just as the veterans of North America were. This is a day for forgetting to do causal analysis for why the wars were fought. This is a day for forgetting that war is actively sought for profit, and how evil political puppets of war profiteers lie their way into wars on behalf of their countries again and again, regardless of what side they are nominally on.
We’ve all been touched by the wars of the 20th centuries in many ways. My VanaEma (grandmother) and my dad effectively lost most of their family, their homes and their heritage, and were refugees in Finland and Sweden. Having lost his real father, my dad ended up abused and damaged by his first step father, a drunken beast who thankfully died in a fishing accident. If there had been no world war, he would have had a home, his real father, his country and family. Dad lived a lot of his life seeming displaced, and not fitting in. VanaEma’s final husband was stuck mentally in his WWII experience, and talked of nothing else, reliving that trauma again and again by inflicting it on anybody around. I think that is why my VanaEma ended up needing a hearing aid — so she could shut off her husband. I don’t celebrate the war that led to all this trauma and displacement.
I don’t think that I personally know any North American veterans of the war, but know of three in my family circle that were made to fight on the German side of the war, all damaged mentally. Two of those men went on to damage their family as they lived out their PTSD, initiating a cycle of abuse that still has an impact today. The thing that we should remember is not the valor and the glory of war, but the evil of war. This should not be a day of triumph and celebration of victory over the enemy, or flag waving, or the mindless propagation of the fable of the “Good war”. We should remember that we had two times in the last century where millions of people fell for the propaganda and coercive conscription imposed by their governments that had them fight and die for wars that should never have been fought at all.
There is no good side in the mass mobilization of men for war, only death.
The FBI appears to have made a mostly useless document release about Epstein. The only non-trivial, non-redacted content that I could find in the first 16/21 of these documents was a black ink purchase order and letter describing it.
The three last documents appear to have some interview notes that might be of investigatory interest, but it appears that, in the interest of protecting a dead pedophile, the FBI has redacted almost anything that could possibly be incriminating.
Jeffrey came down in robe introduced himself
and told her
do you want to make 200.00
go to million or billion
JE said that he knew models
that was the reason
he was going to
times each friend
They went on it
want to go back
won’t do it again
w/ a week or two
Gave # to JE
JE provided advice about
– What to eat – salad
not ????/or drink
drink lots of water
JE paid 200.00
He asked her to
they would want me to
went to JE
given to me from cell
Jeffrey Epstein Part 18 of 21:
Holiday break – X mas
JE purchased ticket
Picked her up
Bottle of champagne
casual asking @ schools
new … about it
talked @ traveling to help w/ school
bathroom in residence later
have … for dinner
went home to
don’t worry about school
Theought that meant he would pay
Got to know you better
finalize plans for summer
bought ticket -> ? paid for it
someone picket her up she did not know
Friday -> Sunday
Some discussion about where she was going to be staying
JE said she will be staying with US
seeing them again -> doign the trip etc
did not want to mess up things for
before x-mas > Months prior to flying to NM
JE called once
+ few hundred dollars
[there is more in this particular pdf to review — more notes from interviews.]
Jeffrey Epstein Part 19 of 21:
– a bunch of photos (recieved 2011), scanned in black and white instead of grey scale. What isn’t redacted is pretty much impossible to see.
I received two supremely annoying Amber alerts on my phone yesterday. They appear to be specifically designed to maximize intrusiveness, which is quite counterproductive, as the natural response is to shut down the incessant pinging as quick as you can. I’ll elaborate on why I consider that these alerts have no value (actually negative value) below.
The thought and action process to deal with the alert is modeled by the following internal dialogue: “Gaghg … what the hell is that noise!? Grab, swipe, clear. Thank god I wasn’t wearing my headphones!” I got a passing glance at the message in the process, enough to see that it was an Amber alert, but no more.
This was pretty much the same process as dealing with an accidental press of that stupid red panic button on a car key fob — you know the one, it’s always triggered because you are trying to hold your keys, phone, and two dribbling travel mugs in one hand, and a backpack, garbage from the car, and a bag of groceries in the other. Like the Amber alert, the panic button just triggers more city noise that is ignored by everybody. It’s been 30 years since car alarms have had any value, but for some reason, instead of just getting rid of them, the manufacturers have supplied an easy way to trigger then accidentally — but I digress.
When yesterday’s second Amber alert triggered, I knew the drill and was able to silence it quickly without even having to look at it. It was time to turn to google and see if there was a way to avoid these. It appears there’s a way to do that on an android, but for the ancient discarded iPhone-6s that I bought for $50 USD (and probably even newer models), I appear to be out of luck. There’s a CRTC ruling that mandates these messages, and phone providers are not allowed to provide a mechanism to disable it. They are also sent with a priority so high that their intrusiveness is off the charts.
Ironically, making the message so intrusive, means that the rush to shut it off means that you loose any chance to actually look at the message. This is a classic example of a government policy backfire, as the policy has the exact opposite effect than the intention.
Later in the day, having struck out with google, I noticed a an #AmberAlert hash tag beside my twitter stream. My thought was, “Perfect, there’s got to be people who know how to deal with this there”, and I posted
There were a couple helpful responses, and the rest basically conformed to expectations that one has for the worst Jon-Ronson “So You’ve Been Publically Shamed” style twitter responses:
Reading those reactions, you’d think that I’m an advocate for kidnapping and abduction, perhaps child sex trafficking, and pedophilia too. How could I be such a piece of shit heartless fucking bastard? Why would I want to avoid a tiny inconvenience when kids lives are at stake? Sigh.
It is striking to observe first hand how easily people are willing to take up arms to shame somebody for a cause, despite not knowing anything about their thought process, or any possible nuances that underlie the perceived offense. It’s truly thoughtless mob mentality.
Understanding that so many people are unfortunate victims of media stranger-danger fear-porn, the vitriolic reactions of the people above make some sense. Like useless car alarms, we’ve had 30+ years of the media pumping it’s danger is everywhere story. Fear sells exceptionally. However, all the worry that’s been drummed into us about the black van at the school taking off with the kids has been shown again and again to be unsubstantiated. Most kidnappings are by family members, largely related to custody issues. Kidnapping is the conflict resolution strategy for desperate white trash trailer park inhabitants who aren’t smart nor sober enough to realize that a split second decision of that nature will only backfire and result in no access to your kids, plus considerable jail time.
Unlike car alarms, media stranger danger carping is not just an annoyance, but has massive social consequences. I’ve now lived in three Markham subdivisions in the last 20 years, where walking the streets would make you think that you are living in a retirement community. There are no kids playing. The parks and the streets are empty on weekends and after school. Kids are kept corralled in their houses, or only let out for carefully supervised play. This fear has also become institutionalized. I know one mother who was afraid to let her 10 year old son out to play at the park alone or try to recruit friends for unsupervised park play, because she was worried that she would be vulnerable to a child protective services induced confiscation of her son.
I know that the media and fear of CPS aren’t the only factors that are keeping kids from outdoor play. Video games, TV, and phones now also compound the problem. We have a couple generations of effectively lost kids, who are all experts on the characters in the 10 Netflix or YouTube series that they’ve binge watched, in countless video games, or other useless knowledge sets. They aren’t kids who know how to play with each other, start conversations, get into fights and make up, or even look each other in the eyes.
The AmberAlert, in my eyes, is just another conduit for media related fear porn. It is also useless. I’ll never know anybody who’s name flashes by in an AmberAlert, not on my phone, on media, or one one of those highway signs. I’ll never know anybody who knows somebody related to an AmberAlert. The chances of one of these messages being relevant is effectively zero. I probably have a better chance of winning the lottery. If I look at 50 Amber alerts, there will be a 50x times more chance that it is relevant: 50 x 0.00000000001 = 0 — just like buying 50 lottery tickets.
You can find plenty of Amber alert advocates that claim they are effective, but it’s not hard to find research that shows the opposite. One such example is this “After 20 years of AMBER Alerts… Are They Worth It?” research gate interview with Timothy Griffin, Associate Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Asked about the success rate of the program, he states: “However, in my reading of the data, the number of children whose lives have been saved by AMBER Alert ranges from zero to something very close to zero.”, and as expected “These cases do not appear to typically involve apparently life-threatening abductors. Rather, they are far more often deployed in familial/custodial disputes and other cases not suggestive of life-threatening peril to the abducted child(ren).” I defer to that interview for other interesting facts, none of which were surprising to me.
The truth of the effectiveness of Amber alerts probably lies in between the glowing stats of the Amber alert advocates, and the more data driven conclusions of Prof. Griffin — but I’d guess the facts are much more strongly skewed towards the conclusions of Prof. Griffin.
Regardless of the effectiveness of the program, not allowing an opt out mechanism for these messages, nor any way to regulate priority, is a strategic mistake by the CRTC, who appears to be pushing the value of this program. Setting inappropriate priorities gets you ignored. In a corporate environment, think of the pencil pusher who sends all his ISO-9001 process conformance emails with urgent priority. You set up a rule in short order to put all emails from that person directly in the trash.
Even if you believed that these alerts were helpful, Amber alerts depend upon an “everybody sees it” strategy that is actually crippled by making these messages mandatory and in your face. The end result is that people will delete without reading, just to silence the offending noise. The probability of even the limited possible success of the alert program is thus sabotaged. The small subset of people who will actually read the Amber alert text, and feel that it is important to do so, is made even smaller by the CRTC policy that enforces “can’t be ignored” and “can’t be prioritized”.
September 29, 2019 math and physics play No comments Advanced Classical Optics, Antenna Theory, Basic Statistical Mechanics, classical mechanics, condensed matter physics, continuum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, FREE class notes, Geometric Algebra for Electrical Engineers, graduate Quantum Mechanics, Modelling of Multiphysics Systems, Prof G. V. Eleftheriades, Prof. Arun Paramekanti, Prof. Erich Poppitz, Prof. John E. Sipe, Prof. Joseph H. Thywissen, Prof. Kausik S. Das, Prof. M. Mojahedi, Prof. Piero Triverio, Prof. Stephen Julian, Prof. Vatche Deyirmenjian, Quantum Field theory I, Quantum Mechanics I, Quantum Mechanics II, relativistic electrodynamics, UofT engineering, UofT physics
Over the last 8 years I took most of the interesting 4th year undergraduate physics courses, and some graduate physics and engineering courses.
Well, my notes for much of that work are now available on amazon.com (or .ca), or for free as PDF. For the bargain price of $88, leveraging the time and money that I spent, you can get very comprehensive paperback notes for these subjects. These notes aren’t textbook quality, but generally contain detailed expositions of the subjects and many worked problems.
Here’s what’s available:
|Title||Professor||Year of study||Format||Price (USD)||Pages|
|Quantum Mechanics I: Notes and problems for UofT PHY356 2010||Prof. Vatche Deyirmenjian||Fall 2010||$0.00||263|
|Quantum Mechanics II: Notes and problems for UofT PHY456 2011||Prof. John E. Sipe||Fall 2011||$0.00||320|
|Relativistic Electrodynamics: Notes and problems from 2011 PHY450H1S||Prof. Erich Poppitz||Winter 2011||Black and white||$11.00||387|
|Classical Mechanics||Prof. Erich Poppitz, + self-study||Winter 2012||$0.00||475|
|Advanced Classical Optics: Notes and problems from UofT PHY485H1F 2012||Prof. Joseph H. Thywissen||Fall 2012||Black and white||$11.00||382|
|Continuum Mechanics: Notes and problems from UofT PHY454H1S 2012||Prof. Kausik S. Das||Winter 2012||Black and white||$10.00||358|
|Basic Statistical Mechanics: Notes and problems from 2013 UofT PHY452H1S||Prof. Arun Paramekanti||Winter 2013||Black and white||$11.00||399|
|Condensed Matter Physics: Notes and problems from UofT PHY487H1F 2013||Prof. Stephen Julian||Fall 2013||Black and white||$10.00||329|
|Modelling of Multiphysics Systems. Notes and problems for UofT ECE1254||Prof. Piero Triverio||Fall 2014||$0.00||300|
|Graduate Quantum Mechanics: Notes and problems from 2015 UofT PHY1520H||Prof. Arun Paramekanti||Winter 2015||Black and white||$12.00||435|
|Antenna Theory: Notes and problems for UofT ECE1229||Prof G. V. Eleftheriades||Winter 2015||$0.00||207|
|Electromagnetic Theory: Notes and problems for UofT ECE1228||Prof. M. Mojahedi||Fall 2016||$0.00||256|
|Geometric Algebra for Electrical Engineers: Multivector electromagnetism||self-study||2016,2017||Colour||$40.00||280|
|Geometric Algebra for Electrical Engineers: Multivector electromagnetism||self-study||2016,2017||Black and white||$12.00||280|
|Quantum Field Theory I: Notes and problems from UofT PHY2403 2018||Prof. Erich Poppitz||Fall 2018||Black and white||$11.00||423|
That’s 4814 pages of notes for 0-$USD 88, depending on whether you want a PDF or paper copy (if available). My cost per page is about $4.7 CAD, factoring in total tuition costs of ~$23000 CAD (most of which was for my M.Eng), but does not factor in the opportunity cost associated with the 20% paycut (w/ a switch to 80% hours) that I also took to find the time to fit in the study.
If you compare my cost of $4.7/page for these notes to FREE – $0.024/page, then I think you would agree that my offering is a pretty good deal! While I have built in a $1 (+/- $0.50) royalty for the book formats, the chances of me recovering my costs are infinitesimal.
A few of the courses and/or collections of notes are not worth the effort of making print ready copies, and those notes are available only in PDF form. An exception are my notes for Multiphyiscs Modelling, which was an excellent course, and I have excellent notes for, but I’ve been asked not to make those notes available for purchase in any form (even w/ $0 royalty.)
My notes from the 2012 UofT session of phy454, Continuum mechanics (aka fluid mechanics), are now available in book form on amazon.com for $10 (black and white, softcover, 6×9″ format, 358 pages), as well as in PDF and latex formats as before.
The theory of continuous matter, including solid and fluid mechanics. Topics include the continuum approximation, dimensional analysis, stress, strain, the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, vorticity, waves, instabilities, convection and turbulence.
It was really only about fluid dynamics. Anything related to solids was really just to introduce the stress and strain tensors as lead up to expressing the Navier-Stokes equation. There was nothing in this course about beam deformation, Euler stability, or similar topics that one might have expected from the course description.
If you download the free PDF, compile the latex version, or buy a paper copy and feel undercharged, feel free to send some bitcoin my way.
If you don’t know COBOL (and I clearly don’t know it well enough), you probably won’t spot that there’s a syntax error here:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. BLAH. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. LINKAGE SECTION. PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY 'BLAH.' UPON CONSOLE. STOP-RUN.
The C equivalent to this program is:
but it is meant to have an exit(0), so we want:
Translating that back into COBOL, we need the STOP-RUN statement to say STOP RUN (no dash). With the -, this gets interpreted as a paragraph label (i.e. STOP-RUN delimits a new function) with no statements in it. What I did was something akin to:
The final program doesn’t have the required ‘return 0’ or ‘exit(0)’ and blows up with a “No stop run nor go back” error condition. Logically, what I really wanted was:
IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. PROGRAM-ID. BLAH. ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. CONFIGURATION SECTION. DATA DIVISION. WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. LINKAGE SECTION. PROCEDURE DIVISION. DISPLAY 'BLAH.' UPON CONSOLE STOP RUN .
This time I’ve left off the period that I had after CONSOLE (which was superfluous and should really only be used at the end of the paragraph (end of “function”)), and also fixes the STOP-RUN -> STOP RUN typo.
This is not the first time I’ve gotten mixed up on when to use DASHES or not. For example, even above, I’d not expect a programmer to know or remember that you need to know to use dashes for WORKING-STORAGE and PROGRAM-ID but not for PROCEDURE DIVISION, nor some of the other space delimited fields.
My eyes are burning, and I left my COBOL programmer safety gear at home.